/landing/
[C][1][2][3][4][5][6]
On http://127.0.0.1:8000/test/thread/f556c79ccd52c84ac513584590feddc3db6a79ffbac298a64f78102970a60e53.html
The long link goes too far, does anyone know how to get it to wrap? I can get this to work on the chalk theme by adding
>word-wrap break-word; to the "a" thing, but it doesn't work with other themes for some reason lol...
wat do?
okay got it finally.
need to change:
>word-wrap: break-word
to
>overflow-wrap: anywhere
>
fixed this for all themes in the latest ver
A new version of the Gladden client has been released (0.0.1).
https://gitgud.io/threshold862543/gladden/-/merge_requests/1
In this version, files are posted to board-specific pools instead of a global files pool. This is probably for the best going forward as it will be easier to keep track of and manage which files you are seeding. Checking the previous pan-board files database for files is supported for backwards compatibility, but can be disabled in config.json.
Without upgrading and staying with the 0.0.0 client, files posted by the 0.0.1 client won't be visible as the board-specific file databases aren't supported, so I recommend upgrading.
When you upgrade, make sure not to overwrite your config/watchedBoards.json.
5 replies omitted, click Reply to view.
>>d1b8a5d3
np, could add more, which do you want in particular?
i like it a lot too, i use it for my default
new board /psy/
join and talk about /psy/ content.
on that note anyone here use 420chan before it went down?
idk who or what psy is sorry
here before the glowniggers arrive
1 reply omitted, click Reply to view.
>>3a6a1bd8
but when they arrive they will crash the board with no survivors
>>dcfc22e5
it isn't possible unless they physically visit every p2p peer
...or just the bootstrap nodes
...or they can wipe
...or they probably can just ddos peers who are not under tor or anything
It seems like gladden works through whonix.
https://peerchan.net/p2p/thread/54.html
So maybe it will be relatively simple to make a setting to have it communicate through SOCKS proxy.
>>82a14d67
I can say that whonix routes packets and node packages are just higher network level, so if something can work under whonix that can't say anything about ease of implementation on node. It seems peerbit does not support proxy natively sooooooo idk
Also in case if browser sandbox will be breached with exploit (or gladden node itself, somehow), app-level proxy setting would not safe user from IP leak, while whonix would.
But proxy would still be good option to have yea
______________________
Posted from Whonix™ Workstation® 17
>>a8a93faf
Good points... hmm. This might be something that libp2p can do but it's not totally clear yet how.
[C][1][2][3][4][5][6]
